The Democratic Party was fracturing Friday as a torrent of frustration and anger was unleashed at Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Chuck Schumer, who faced what they saw as an awful choice: shut the government down or consent to a Republican funding bill that allows President Donald Trump to continue slashing the federal government.
After Mr. Schumer announced that he would reluctantly support the bill, he bore the brunt of that anger, including a protest at his office, calls from progressives that he be primaried in 2028 and suggestions that the Democratic Party would soon be looking for new leaders.
Nine other members of the Democratic Caucus — a contingent of mostly swing-state and retiring senators — eventually joined Mr. Schumer in voting to advance the Republican funding proposal, providing crucial support to bring it to a final vote. It passed late Friday with Sens. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Angus King of Maine voting with Republicans in favor.
Since their election losses, Democrats have been hunkered against a barrage of Mr. Trump’s early actions in office, locked out of legislative power and left searching for a plan to regain political momentum. But as Mr. Schumer let pass one of the rare moments when the party might regain leverage in Washington, the Democratic Party erupted in a moment of anger that had been building for months.
Many in the party felt the New York Democrat was not showing sufficient fight, arguing that a government shutdown would have forced Trump and Republicans to the negotiating table. Yet for Mr. Schumer, who has led Senate Democrats since Mr. Trump took office in 2016, the choice ultimately came down to preventing a shutdown that he believed would only hand Mr. Trump more power and leave his party with the blame for disruptions to government services.
“A shutdown would allow DOGE to shift into overdrive,” Mr. Schumer warned on the Senate floor Friday, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency effort led by Elon Musk.
Mr. Schumer voted no on the final vote for the funding bill, which only needed a simple majority to pass. Nonetheless, House Democrats released a stream of angry statements and social media posts aimed at Mr. Schumer.
Democratic Rep. Troy Carter of Louisiana shared a photo of Mr. Trump and Mr. Schumer engaged in conversation with the caption, “A picture is worth a thousand words!”
Even in the Senate, hardly any Democrats were speaking up in support of Mr. Schumer’s strategy Friday. It was a remarkable turn for the longtime Democratic leader, leaving him standing practically alone.
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, his longtime ally and partner in funding fights of the past, said in a statement, “Let’s be clear: neither is a good option for the American people. But this false choice that some are buying instead of fighting is unacceptable.”
Ms. Pelosi added that the senators should listen to the women who lead appropriations for Democrats, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut and Sen. Patty Murray of Washington. They had proposed a 30-day stopgap plan instead of the Republican proposal that provides funding until September. The Republican bill will trim $13 billion in non-defense spending from the levels in the 2024 budget year and increase defense spending by $6 billion.
As House Democrats, who almost all voted against the bill earlier this week, concluded a retreat in northern Virginia Friday, they also called for their Senate colleagues to show more fight. House Democratic leadership rushed back to the Capitol to hold a news conference and urge senators to reject the bill.
“We do not want to shutdown the government. But we are not afraid of a government funding showdown,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said.
He also repeatedly declined to answer questions about whether he had confidence in Mr. Schumer.
Other Democrats, such as Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, who is seen as a potential presidential candidate in 2028 and also visited the Democratic retreat, called for a broader movement. He mentioned the recent 60th anniversary of peaceful civil rights protests in Selma, Alabama, and argued that Democrats need to find “collective courage.”
“When those individuals marched, there wasn’t one voice,” Mr. Beshear said. “There was a collective courage of that group that changed the world. That day opened up the eyes of the country to what was really going on.”
Some were ready to start marching.
“We’re ready to get out of this building and head back to the Capitol at any moment and prevent the government from shutting down,” said Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
“Now is the moment for Democrats to draw a line in the stand and say that we stand very firmly on the side of working class people and against the ultra-rich that are trying to corrupt our government for themselves,” he added.
Meanwhile, some of the nation’s most influential progressive groups warned of serious political consequences for Senate Democrats and predicted a fierce backlash when members of Congress return home next week.
Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible, which has organized hundreds of protests across the nation, said that nearly 8 in 10 of the group’s activists support primary challenges against “Senate Dems who cave on the GOP bill.”
He wrote on social media that the vast majority of those Democratic activists plan to express their anger at town halls or other public events next week. MoveOn, another progressive group that claims nearly 10 million members nationwide, predicted that its activists would also demand answers from Democratic officials in the coming days
“Clearing the way for Donald Trump and Elon Musk to gut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is unacceptable. It’s past time for Democrats to fight and stop acting like it’s business as usual,” said Joel Payne, a spokesperson for MoveOn.
Senate Democrats were also mostly unwilling to speak up to defend Mr. Schumer’s move. Sen. Raphael Warnock, a Georgia Democrat, even suggested that the party should be looking for new leaders in the coming years.
“I think come ’26, ’28, we’ll get some new leadership,” he said. His office later said Warnock was answering the question broadly.
Mostly, though, senators just lamented that they had been jammed by a Republican Party that has found a new sense of unity under Mr. Trump. For years, House Republicans have not been able to muster votes for government funding on their own, forcing them into bipartisan negotiations. This time, they passed the bill on party lines and left Washington.
“We’re stuck with two bad choices presented by a unified Republican front,” said Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat.
He voted against the bill, yet said of Mr. Schumer’s decision: “These are tough, tough calls.”
This article is by The Associated Press. AP writer Leah Askarinam in Washington contributed. Peoples reported from New York and Brown reported from Leesburg, Virginia.
